How do you feel about your particular fusion between self and art? I suppose, in a way, Freud as a person has become almost inseparable from his writings. Certainly his great writings like ‘The Interpretation of Dreams’ were the result of much self-analysis. James Putnam: Freud has had an enormous influence on our attitudes towards sexuality and has revolutionised how we think about ourselves. Sarah Lucas in Conversation with Curator james Putnam All rights reserved.Beyond the Pleasure Principle, 2000, Sarah Lucas In sum, neuroscience suggest that the Freudian model favours the hedonic modality of reward circuit to the detriment of its motivational modality.įreudian theory Motivation Plaisir Pleasure Reinforcement Renforcement Reward Récompense Théorie freudienne.Ĭopyright © 2013 L’Encéphale, Paris. However, these studies have also indicated that, unlike proposed by Freud, pleasure is not only the result of obtaining a satisfaction but has also a role in the promotion of action. In addition to these data, neuroscience studies have confirmed, as proposed by Freud, the homeostatic role of pleasure when the latter is triggered by an internal need. In this way, pleasure contributes to an increased level of organism excitation. Therefore, anticipation of a satisfaction activates neurochemical pleasure mechanisms and reinforces behaviour which facilitates its obtention.
Experimental studies performed in animals have shown that increased dopaminergic activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA, where dopaminergic cell bodies lie) results either from an unexpected reward or, after recognition of the reward characteristics, from the anticipation of the reward. Activity of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway is strongly associated with the reward system.
Studies on the neurobiological mechanisms responsible for the development of pleasure may help to fill this gap in the Freudian theory. Freud's 1905 publication, which describes how preliminary sexual pleasures contribute to an increased excitation and a sexual satisfaction, is the only analysis which provides an adapted answer to the apparent paradox of pleasure and excitation co-existence. However, clinical contradictions to this model, such as the occasional co-existence between pleasure and excitation, drove Freud to suggest different theoretical reversals. Satisfaction of a need would induce both a decrease in tension and the development of pleasure. This quantitative approach corresponds to the classical scheme that associates satisfaction and pleasure. In Freud's theory, pleasure is assumed to be the result of the discharge of the accumulated excitation which will thus reduce the tension. The Freudian concept of pleasure is more univocal. Pleasure can indeed be either rewarding when it follows satisfaction, or incentive when it reinforces behaviours. Like all emotions, pleasure is acknowledged as a motivating factor in contemporary models. In this paper, we aim at comparing Freud's propositions to those issued from recent findings in Neuroscience.
The Freudian theory of pleasure, because it is based on biological principles, appears an appropriate topic to perform this task. Instead of going on arguing we think that it may be more constructive to favour dialogue through the analysis of a precise concept developed in each discipline. Despite many controversies the debate between psychoanalysis and neuroscience remains intense, all the more since the Freudian theory stands as a reference for a number of medical practitioners and faculty psychiatrists, at least in France.
0 kommentar(er)
